i only wonder about the different behavior.
Post by Andreas DÃ¶hler
where is the problem? If you cluster a local check then on the cluster
resource you see the originator of this check result.
In you case the check result was produced on hv02.chaos.inc and then
clustered on your cluster resource.
Is there any error message or unwanted output with the clustered checks?
With clustered local checks you have the possibility to decide if the
end result should be the best state or the worst state of all single
In you case this is not relevant as only one node is producing a local
check result. But with more nodes producing the same local check
it will help to build a cluster state for this local check.
I found that all local checks on a cluster node has a different output
than on a unclusterd node.
In example i monitor the signal strength of two vdr systems, one on a
clustered pve workstation and the other on an unclustered stand alone
The cluster only includes the pve services like vms and network interfaces.
OK - VDR plugin femon sgnl is at 60 %
OK - On node hv02.chaos.inc: OK - VDR plugin femon sgnl is at 73 %
The local plugin is the same on both nodes.
Is this the wanted behavior?
Hint: The answer is not 42. ;)
checkmk-en mailing list